User-facing label: “Established Funding” → “Revenue Based”
Status: accepted Date: 2026-07-09 Operator-visible copy that today says Established Funding (or “Established”) for the MCA / SBA / BLOC family is renamed to Revenue Based in Phase 9e. Workflow / code identifiers stayestablished_funding until a later cleanup.
Decision
- Phase 9e renames all operator-facing strings for this product family to Revenue Based (card titles, approve/confirm dialog, coaching copy, queue/CRM labels, help text in-app). The screenshot surface that currently reads “ESTABLISHED FUNDING” becomes “REVENUE BASED” when MCA / BLOC / SBA rows are split (ADR-0003).
- Code and persisted ids stay for Phase 9:
established_fundingworkflow primary,evaluateEstablished,establishedSubVariant, related schema fields. Glossary documents the split: UX label = Revenue Based; machine id =established_funding. - A later optional cleanup may rename identifiers; that is out of scope for Phase 9 (wide churn, no operator value).
Context
Product language is shifting away from “Established” toward revenue-based products (MCA, BLOC; SBA questionnaire-gated). Phase 9e already rewrites the Established card (three rows, Coming Soon SBA CTA, per-product reasons) — bundling the label rename avoids a second pass over the same UI.Considered options
- A — Phase 9e label rename; keep code ids (accepted).
- B — Separate label-only PR before Phase 9 — rejected; same surfaces get touched again in 9e.
- C — Defer rename entirely — rejected; operators would see a redesigned card still titled Established.
Consequences
- Mintlify / help docs that say “Established Funding” should be updated in the same Phase 9e PR or an immediate follow-up doc PR — do not leave public docs on the old name after the app ships.
- AI prompts / narration that say “established” for operator-facing prose should use “revenue based” where the audience is the operator; internal coaching path codes may keep
established_*until the id cleanup. - Glossary: CONTEXT.md → “Revenue Based (UX label)”. System reference:
docs/design/underwriting.md§7.

